David Watanabe wrote:
>
> > p.s. What do you all think about me making the final logo decision?
>
> sure :)
>
> > leaning towards <http://www.exosci.com/turbine/1.1/fire3.gif> with a
> > slightly smaller sized glyph.
>
> Since there's general agreement on this, I've put up refined variations (one
> of which will hopefully be the final version) at:
>
> http://www.exosci.com/turbine/1.2/
>
> fire3-1 and fire3-2 are richer in colour than fire3, which looked somewhat
> washed out (you may need to open them in multiple browser windows to notice
> the difference). I've also included versions (-small) which have a smaller
> glyph (80% of original).
>
> For what it's worth, I'm strongly +1 on any of the 1.2 revisions. The 1.2
> revs are very similar, and I'm happy with both of them (size doesn't matter
> to me).
>
> btw...I'll be without a photoshop-equipped computer for a week starting
> tommorow, so hopefully one of the 1.2 revs will be sufficient.
Wonderful job Dave! It's a hard choice, but I like the 3-1 gifs the
best. I think that the lighter glyph provides better contrast with the
black turbine lettering.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
