Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 8/3/2000 4:40 PM, "Daniel L. Rall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jon Stevens wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> I don't think that Turbine itself should be distributed any longer. I think
> >> it should be the TDK that gets distributed.
> >
> > This means that if I want to use turbine.jar as a library for Joist that
> > I have to either get the TDK or build Turbine from CVS. Even though I'd
> > probably build from source anyhow, it sure would be nice to still have
> > Turbine's functionality available separately.
>
> What is the difference between downloading the TDK and getting turbine.jar
> from it and downloading Turbine and getting turbine.jar from it?
Probably a couple megs of stuff I don't necessarily want.
> The reason why I only want to distribute one thing is because it simplifies
> the documentation and packaging quite a bit.
Hmmm...yes, packaging would be somewhat simplified. Documentation, on
the other hand, will be more likely to become more coupled and less
specific to individual componenets.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
