>
> > I personally think it would help the adoption of the product if an official
> > release was made. Is this going to happen if WM is released with an
> > acceptable ASF license? I would interesting in knowing what is happening
> > "behind the scenes." Not knowing much about copyright law, can the GPL be
> > revoked once code is released with the license? I thought the GPL was
> > structured in such a way as to prevent this. Collab.net isn't going to
> > make a monetary deal with Jason to change the license are you? Now that
> > could be weird.
To restate my question, does anyone know what the legalities are for
changing the license on released GPL code? Is this at the discretion of
the those how hold the copyright? Do all copyright holders have to
agree? Linus couldn't come out tomorrow and decide to change the kernel
license to BSD if he wanted to right. Isn't that the point of GPL?
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
