Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 9/5/2000 10:49 PM, "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In that case how about putting in some minimal documentation somewhere
> > that mentions the consequences of ignoring this problem, how to do the
> > above and where to look. The current postgresql howto implies that
> > turbine simply won't work without these patches. I'm totally brand new
> > to all this, and I just want to get something up and running. Being told
> > that I have to hack postgres like this just to get it working is
> > offputting.
>
> thank you for the suggestion. would you like to help contribute some wording
> that would help prevent others from not being putt off by hacking postgres?
At the moment I don't understand what the issues are. I think you're
saying that this breaks something unimportant and it can be fixed by
implementing it yourself some other way. I'd just be happy right now if
I could get it working.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
