"Daniel L. Rall" wrote:
>
> Chris wrote:
> >
> > "Daniel L. Rall" wrote:
> >
> > > I can't believe that people can really be convinced that they need all
> > > the extra shit described in that tired old paper. It makes sense in
> > > certain contexts (billing systems, etc.), certainly, but not for your
> > > run of the mill web app.
> >
> > Will you like getting out of bed at 3am to recover the database because
> > of a power outage or other system crash?. That's what a logging database
> > is all about, it can recover from sudden failure all by itself, which I
> > consider an essential feature for anything running 24hrs a day, which
> > the web clearly does.
>
> I'm clearly skeptical. ;)
Which part are you skeptical about?
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
