Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 9/5/2000 11:43 PM, "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well umm, I have been posting about this for a number of weeks now,
>
> I'm sorry that is has been frustrating, but for a number of weeks now I have
> been posting about how things are in a state of flux. You should realize
> that you are working on bleeding edge technology and should expect things to
> be broken once and a while. Of course, we are doing our best to work our
> asses off to make things better for you. In case you missed it, this is a
> volunteer project and we depend on those volunteers to make this thing work.
> If it isn't working, then become a volunteer and help out.
I know you're all volunteers etc etc, but the way to advance the cause
is to get more users and developers. The way to get more devlopers is to
lower the cost of the product. The cost in this case is time and lots of
it. The way for you to find out that this product has a high entry-level
cost is for me to give feedback, which is what I'm doing. Once I get it
working and actually understand how it works then gradually you can
expect some contributions from me.
I'll be trying some of the other suggestions posted today to see if it
helps.
> > (obviously the
> > buildturbine.sh doesn't do dependancies right)
>
> Please look at the code...that fine doesn't have anything to do with
> dependencies [sic].
Again, I don't know what the issues are, but I do know that it didn't
work until I did a "find turbine -name \*.class | xargs rm -f". See
previous postings.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
