on 9/7/2000 8:11 AM, "Christopher Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is correct. Kinda redundant, huh?
>
> As it stands currently, xdocs output goes to docs.new, which seems silly to
> me.
> Therefore, I'd like to propose that we remove the current docs directory
> altogether (after, of course, ensuring that all of its contents have been
> replicated in xdocs) and change xdocs output location to docs.
>
> Of course, this proposal already has my +1. :-)
-1 for the reasons I expressed before.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
