Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 9/7/2000 8:11 AM, "Christopher Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That is correct. Kinda redundant, huh?
> >
> > As it stands currently, xdocs output goes to docs.new, which seems silly to
> > me.
> > Therefore, I'd like to propose that we remove the current docs directory
> > altogether (after, of course, ensuring that all of its contents have been
> > replicated in xdocs) and change xdocs output location to docs.
> >
> > Of course, this proposal already has my +1. :-)
>
> -1 for the reasons I expressed before.
Yes, thanks for the explanation. I retract my +1 until the Java
situation on locus can be resolved. ;)
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
