Jon, I completely agree with what you are saying... but it also shows me
that you don't understand what I am talking about. Considering I, and many
other people who have asked the same question (and I have seen no solution
posted) have no CVS write access, I was offering a suggestion of how to get
around this problem without rewriting the Document object of ECS. This was
never meant to be a fix and if you go look at my initial post again more
carefully than you did before, I broke it up into 2 parts.
1) suggestions for getting around problems with Turbine if you are like me
and don't have write access so you only have to change the Turbine souce and
not ECS as well
then I put a ---------------------------------------------------
2) things I thought might be a good idea to be changed in Turbine.
There were 4 points, 2 were of the first type and 2 were of the second type.
Please know your facts before being complete rude to someone who is only
trying to help. Don't worry, I won't do it again.
- Joe Hudson
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jon Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:40 PM
To: Turbine
Subject: Re: contributions (<body> tag & WebMacro Layout)
on 9/12/2000 11:14 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe Hudson wrote:
>
>> This is incorrect... atleast with the version I have which I have as of
>> about 2 weeks ago... I know that you are correct in stating that this
used
>> to work but it does not (as of about 2 weeks ago). What I mentioned
before
>> assumed adding the getLayout method to your screen object because that is
>> how you set your layout. What I mentioned adding only makes getLayout
work.
>> Without that, no matter what layout you use with getLayout... the default
>> layout will be retrieved. Does this make sense?
>
> There a bug was introduced while implementing TemplateService (I think),
> but John McNally said that he fixed it, and he's going to check in the
> change soon. See his post to this thread...
Again, the point here that you are totally missing Joe is that if something
is broken, we should fix it, BUT not by adding a horrible hack to fix it.
That is just irresponsible engineering and isn't tolerated around here.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
