+1
I would like to point out that it should be possible to have a TurbineRole
(for example) map to some columns in an existing schema. This is the reason
for lines like:
/** The table name for this peer. */
private static final String TABLE_NAME = mapBuilder.getTableRole();
in the peers. I do not know the current state of this functionality. Can
anyone enlighten me?
John McNally
----- Original Message -----
From: Rafal Krzewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Turbine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 3:50 PM
Subject: [vote] DB Schema
> Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> I proposed a possible table naming scheme a while ago,
> but not many of the developers shared their opinions.
>
> Visitor -> TurbineUser
> (new table) TurbineGroup
> UserRole -> > TurbineRole
> Permission -> TurbinePermission
> VisitorRole -> TurbineUserGroupRole
> RolePermission -> TurbineRolePermission
>
> pros
> + does not confict with SQL reserved words
> + matches class naming
> + more intuitive
> + less probability with user app living in the same DB
>
> cons
> - more typing
>
> >> +1 from me. <<
>
> Your opinions?
>
> --
> Rafal Krzewski
> Senior Internet Developer
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
