Rafal Krzewski wrote:
>
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> > > I think that the term 'Group' is more general. For Scarab 'Team' sounds great,
> > > but 'A group of users related to a document' sounds more natural than
> > > 'A team of users related to a document'.
> >
> > So, what does the database schema look like? "group" is a reserved keyword.
>
> ouch. this was discussed before. what about "UserGroup", I'd like to keep class
> name though (we have 'User' class and 'Visitor' table...)
>
> BTW. I'm still on IRC :)))
I prefer UserGroup.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://collab.net/ | open source | do the right thing
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
