on 10/26/2000 6:04 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Logging is one of the major points that have to be addressed before
> Turbine release,
> there were some voices about adapting IBM's log4j package or logging
> package from
> Avalon which is probaly more favourable because it comes from fellow
> Jakarta
> project, and it's being used in Velocity, which would make the future
> integration
> of the logging systems easier.
>
> AFAIK currently there's none activity regarding this underway. Seems
> like a good place
> for somebody to jump in and help.
>
> Rafal
This isn't real public yet, but log4j will become an Apache project in a few
months. So, using either Avalon or log4j is fine with me.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
