On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Jon Stevens wrote:
> on 10/26/2000 6:04 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Logging is one of the major points that have to be addressed before
> > Turbine release,
> > there were some voices about adapting IBM's log4j package or logging
> > package from
> > Avalon which is probaly more favourable because it comes from fellow
> > Jakarta
> > project, and it's being used in Velocity, which would make the future
> > integration
> > of the logging systems easier.
> >
> > AFAIK currently there's none activity regarding this underway. Seems
> > like a good place
> > for somebody to jump in and help.
> >
> > Rafal
>
> This isn't real public yet, but log4j will become an Apache project in a few
> months. So, using either Avalon or log4j is fine with me.
Does anyone know much about log4j? If we start making a
new logging system we could use it in both Velocity and
Turbine. I started using org.apache.log simply because
it was an apache project but if someone has more experience
with log4j then maybe it's the appropriate thing to
use?
jvz.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
