Thanks, this worked a treat with the Cocoon 1.8 Turbine version. I'm just
posting this in cases anyone else is wondering...
BTW I think Postgres and MS SQL are both lovely. Stop fighting.
Patrick
At 12:12 30/10/2000 +0000, you wrote:
> >
> > Curious to know if anyone has managed to get either
> > ...
> > 2) The Turbine implementation that DOES work with Cocoon 1.8 to work with
> > MS SQL server. I have connectivity via the esql logic sheet, but
> > can't get connection pooling to work (gives a driver not implemented
> > error, unsurprisingly).
>
>I don't know about Cocoon, but I am using an old version of Turbine (not
>the TDK). I just added the following lines in my TurbineResources.properties
>file, and now SQL Server works like a charm:
>
>#### Sybase (MSSQL)
>database.adaptor=DBSybase
>database.adaptor.DBSybase=com.ashna.jturbo.driver.Driver
>#database.adaptor.DBSybase=sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver
>#database.adaptor.DBSybase=com.inet.tds.TdsDriver
>
>
>I'm using JTurbo, but checked out the com.inet.tds also and they worked
>fine. I'm using the Turbine connection pools and they work fine.
>
> > BTW, SQL Server is not my choice! Couldn't convince client to use
> > Postgres =[
>
>I'm sorry to say so, but SQL Server definitely does not suck. We are
>using the freely distributable MSDE, as well as supporting PostgreSQL,
>and the MSDE is visibly faster :(
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
