on 11/4/2000 10:24 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that it's not really critical to share security information with
> other applications. There is a good chance that they will be organizing
> their
> permissions system in an incompatible way.
>
> If you still think that this is worth pursuing, we could use the
> adaptive peer
> approach we have in TurbineUserPeer.
Again, I only said it cause it is necessary for me to have that
functionality. CollabNet is essentially taking a ton of different
technologies and merging them together into a platform by modifying them as
needed, such as making perl scripts get their ACL information from the same
tables.
-jon
--
http://scarab.tigris.org/ | http://noodle.tigris.org/
http://java.apache.org/ | http://java.apache.org/turbine/
http://www.working-dogs.com/ | http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
http://www.collab.net/ | http://www.sourcexchange.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
