Jon Stevens wrote:
>
> on 10/31/2000 7:06 AM, "Rafal Krzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Role's et al. attributes don't need to be searchable (or at least I
> > can't
> > think of any use for that)
> > 2) You have to deal with the situation where user set's an attribute and
> > there
> > is no column for it. It's easier to deal with if we have the
> > hashtable handy.
>
> The problem with this though is if you want to use this same ACL scheme with
> another language at the same time.
>
> -1 on serialized hashtables for ACL stuff.
I think that it's not really critical to share security information with
other applications. There is a good chance that they will be organizing
their
permissions system in an incompatible way.
If you still think that this is worth pursuing, we could use the
adaptive peer
approach we have in TurbineUserPeer.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
