No offense, but:
I never waste my time... and I do read all the messages on this (and many
other) mailing lists...
I also said "in combo with different JDK's on Linux" - that was actually the
point, especially since mem usage was a factor in one of our deployment
scenarios, and not necessarily performance. We also tested the latest
versions of Resin and Tomcat, none of which have been compared
quantitatively at that stage.
Frank
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Turbine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: Choice of production servlet engine
> on 11/8/2000 12:21 PM, "Frank Conradie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We did a wide variety of tests with Tomcat and Resin in combo with
different
> > JDK's on Linux, comparing mem usage, performance, etc., and Resin came
out
> > well on top. I'll ask Leon to post the results somewhere for you to have
a
> > look at and comment on.
> >
> > Cheers, Frank
>
> No offense, but "duh!". <big fat smile> :-)
>
> Tomcat was originally a reference implementation, not a production quality
> server. Even 3.1 isn't there at all. Only 3.3 is getting close to that and
> it isn't even released yet. This has been stated about a bazillion times
on
> the mailing list. :-( I'm afraid that you simply wasted your time with
> analysis of something that has been stated many times now.
>
> -jon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
