Leon Messerschmidt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Current in TurbineUserPeer there is code that prevents the USER_ID to be
> added to the Permanent storage
>
> if ( ! ( columnNames[j].equalsIgnoreCase( USER_ID_COLUMN )
> || columnNames[j].equalsIgnoreCase( OBJECT_DATA_COLUMN ) ))
> {
> // Add to storage
> }
>
> Would it be ok to remove the USER_ID_COLUMN restriction so that I can get a
> hold of the USER_ID with
>
> id = data.getUser().getPerm("USER_ID");
>
> Or is there some reason that I don't see for USER_ID to be excluded from the
> permanentStorage?
>
I am not sure that it won't cause a problem, I guess you will have to
test. But I do not really like putting the value in two places, why
don't you want to call the getPrimaryKey method? Are you trying to
avoid a cast?
John McNally
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
