Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Yes, I would like this too. The concern I have is with the
> admin app where the username is the unique identifier
> but it can be edited. I like the ID notion for a user
> for all security implementations: then you always have
> a unique identifier that is hidden.
> Even for LDAP couldn't
> you use the UniqueId Service to give a user a unique
> identifier?
Not really. The id's are guaranteed to be unique throughout
the until context shutdown/restart. Otherwise they'd require
some form of permanent storage.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
