On 11 Jan 2001, Daniel Rall wrote:
> John McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why not have User include the getPrimaryKeyXXX() methods, then have the
> > default or non-db implementations set the login id as the PK?
> >
> > John McNally
>
> +1, great suggestion.
Yes, I would like this too. The concern I have is with the
admin app where the username is the unique identifier
but it can be edited. I like the ID notion for a user
for all security implementations: then you always have
a unique identifier that is hidden. Even for LDAP couldn't
you use the UniqueId Service to give a user a unique
identifier?
jvz.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
