on 1/11/01 6:17 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I would like this too. The concern I have is with the
> admin app where the username is the unique identifier
> but it can be edited. I like the ID notion for a user
> for all security implementations: then you always have
> a unique identifier that is hidden. Even for LDAP couldn't
> you use the UniqueId Service to give a user a unique
> identifier?
>
> jvz.
What I don't understand is why in LDAP you can't simply define a "column"
where you store the User ID (ie: integer number).
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
