On 6/28/07, Alberto Valverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 28, 2007, at 9:21 PM, Noah Gift wrote: > > > > On 6/28/07, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-28-06 at 18:11 +0200, Florent Aide wrote: > > > Hum... > > > > > > +0 on this. I do a _lot_ of plain SA in my work hours and I also do a > > > lot of plain SA in TG or other for home grown projects and I would > > > expect TG to come with plain SA by default. > > > > > > The SA docs are really good and the expressiveness of plain SA is sooo > > > excellent... We can always have an elexir optional switch on the > > > command line... > > > > > > As a newcomer to any project boasting to support SA I would expect the > > > project to have a plain SA mode and not "hide" it inside some wrapper. > > > > > > If a lot of people prefer to have elexir as default, so be it. But > > > then at least provide plain active_mapper SA as an option. > > > > > > My opinion on this is that we should have a LOT more switches available > > on tg-admin quickstart with a nice write up showing us what happens. > > This should include things like changing what parts of the code are > > enabled by default. For example, an awful lot of code starts off > > commented out. If we use -s, I think it's safe to say that importing the > > model should start active. Perhaps if we use -w, widgets and validators > > start imported, etc. > > > > A big selling point of tg is how easy it is to get up and running the > > first time, but this has been getting worse, not better, with all the > > new features as not all starting defaults are sensible anymore. ( I just > > taught my girlfriend TG so I have been noticing this a lot lately! ) > > > > Iain > > > > I volunteered to help with making a our sweet command line tool, with > whoever wants to help. I think we can subclass paste though and it for the > dirty work. Would it be too crazy to make separate mailing lists for > different sub-projects? Or is that too nuts. > > > I think it´s better to keep the command-line subproject discussion in the > trunk mailing list for now since it'll be very closely tied to TG anyway. > Another reason, more presonal hence more subjective, is that I'm already > having a hard time keeping up with all the TG2 related discussion going on > in 4 different mailing lists, 3 blogs and reddit. ;) >
It is a bit crazy isn't it. TG2 is part Pylons-discuss/pygears/turbogears/turbogears-trunk and some other lists we are on :) So, what is our plan for the tool...use paster right...but what functionality do we need to add? Alberto > > > > -- http://www.blog.noahgift.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
