> Yes please! Make Toolbox components separate projects with a dedicated > maintainer so that hopefully we don't get the situation with abandoned > components like CatWalk and ModelDesigner again.
Should we make the TurboGears 2 toolbox a separate project itself? We can ship with it but keep it outside the core. I'm not sure what to think here, I think the Toolbox is an important component, an the toolbox itself isn't much work to maintain, because there's very little code. But, I kind of like the idea that the core TurboGears2 project is just the code needed for the basic turbogears api, and all the extras live in separate eggs. So, I can go either way on this one. What do you all think? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
