On Saturday 14 July 2007 13:45:48 Jonathan LaCour wrote: > I have always found the toolbox to be more of a neat toy than something > very useful. In addition, I don't like the fact that it installs with > my production applications, since I really don't want something like > CatWalk available from my production application.
Well, the way it is you have to start another "daemon" to have Catwalk et al. on your server. The code is there, but it isn't used / usable by default. I don't use the toolbox except for the Widget Browser and I don't see that as a security risk. > Personally, I think ToolBox 2 should start off as a separate project > that TurboGears 2.0 does *not* include as a dependancy. To me, its not > much to ask people who want to use it to type a single easy_install > command. At the very least, it should be part of a "extras" TurboGears > distribution so that you can install in production without including the > toolbox. I agree that it isn't useful on production servers for our -- mine and yours -- use cases... I have no objection on not making it a standard requirement and making it a complete add-on and optional package. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
