On 9/3/07, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > >The difference is mainly in the default options (SA, Genshi) and thus > >templates for quickstart. But all patches to 1.0 go in 1.1 also. You are > >right that at the moment their should be no other difference. > > > > > I just did a comparison, not much as you said. I noticed [3213] hadn't > been merged to 1.1, so I've done that.
I should have said the main _intended_ difference :). The last "should" was just for this. I didn't have time to manage a proper synch of 1.1 yet so I cannot be authoritative in my answers > > There are two differences I couldn't understand: > > diff -br tg10/turbogears/command/info.py tg11/turbogears/command/info.py > 10c10 > < "Toolbox Plugins" : "turbogears.toolboxcommand"} > --- > > "Toolbox Gadgets" : "turbogears.toolboxcommand"} http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/3229 Fred just applied a change in the 1.1 branch without back porting it... you can take the 1.1 version and put it in 1.0. > > diff -br tg10/turbogears/view/base.py tg11/turbogears/view/base.py > 349c349 > < "genshi.lookup_errors" : config.get("genshi.lookup_errors", > "strict"), > --- > > "genshi.variable_lookup" : > config.get("genshi.variable_lookup", "strict"), I remember something about this one. I'd say (from the top of my head) that the 1.0 version is the one we want. I could not resist to look at it so here your are, this is no more from the top of my head: http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/3326 take the 1.0 version and put it in 1.1 > >As an example, removal of the active_mapper code (since it is deprecated > > > > > Hopefully ActiveMapper will still be usable; you'll just need to put a > line at the top of the model to connect ActiveMapper to TurboGears. Yep. But last release we had problems related to ActiveMapper using python 2.3 incompatible synthax or something, so I'd like to ask in the TG user list if no-one relies on it... we could just kill it. > > >At the same time I'd like to propose/discuss the drop of python 2.3 > > > > > I'd say not for 1.1, as most of the hard work has already been done. > Open to that for TG 2.0 though. Hum I know we did some hard work during the last release (like compiling RuleDispatch and such for py23 on Windows using Cygwin because none of us had VS60) but I expect some more hard work to come. We had failing test cases only under python23... and this means I need to keep a python23 installed with all components in place just for this... But you are right :) If we do not encounter too much problems during next release I'll not propose this again for 1.x. But be advised that at the moment tests are failing badly under py23 & py24 and are running like a charm under 25... (on Windows at least) > Getting SA0.4 support in would be good, as this will probably be the > last TG release before SA0.4-final. Yep. I have worked a lot with SA 0.4 on some other projects recently (and ported one project using SA 0.3 to SA 0.4) so I have a good feeling about SA 0.4 But, at the same time I am wondering how much breakage this will imply and how much delay this would provoke. If you want to take the burden with me on this one I'll gladly postpone the release (planned for this week since I laked energy enough this weekend) to make 0.4 become a reality in TG 1.0.4. If we being the 0.4 port of TG 1.0.x then we need to assess how much time we need. So if you tell me you want to try this with me I propose we setup irc "rendez-vous" for Wednesday --> Friday included and hack like hell :) If we see the changes take too much time then we just release 1.0.4beta1 and go for SA04 in the 1.1 release. My concern on this matter is that 0.4 is vastly non compatible with 0.3. Code written in the applications that used 0.3 did things like: User.select(User.c.email_address=='[EMAIL PROTECTED]') now they will need to have a form like this: session.query(User).filter(User.email_adress=='[EMAIL PROTECTED]') which is somewhat different, because we now need a _ScopedSession_ for each *controller thread*. But let's start a new thread specifically to speak of SA 0.4 in TG 1.x :) Cheers, Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
