I guess it's a question of what's reasonable. I am currently leading a vitality project where the IDE is no longer supported and major components of the application server environment will go unsupported at the end of the month. This customer has been in 'bug fix' mode for over 2 years with no real development happening to speak of. If people are running Python 2.3, how many of them have solid intentions of going to 1.x? Python 2.4 came out in, what, December 2003? There is a lot to be said in favour of keeping the project limber and moving forward.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge Godoy Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 10:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [tg-trunk] Re: Unit tests & 1.1 branch On Saturday 01 September 2007 20:11:14 Florent Aide wrote: > At the same time I'd like to propose/discuss the drop of python 2.3 > support in the 1.1 branch. Python 2.3 support is a burden and takes a > lot of efforts. I'll alsoe ask more publicly in the user list, but if > there is not real uproar we'll just drop it :) I'm OK for dropping Python 2.3, but I remember that there are some people on the mailing list still using it. And it is not uncommon to find Python 2.3 on ISPs (even older versions!), with no option to upgrade... Maybe we should drop this on 2.0, but still keep this burden on the 1.X branches. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
