Hi, >The last "should" was just for this. I didn't have time to manage a >proper synch of 1.1 yet so I cannot be authoritative in my answers > > With those merges done, I'm happy they're pretty well synced now.
>Yep. But last release we had problems related to ActiveMapper using >python 2.3 incompatible synthax or something, so I'd like to ask in >the TG user list if no-one relies on it... we could just kill it. > > Well, I'm still using it :-) I'll make a fix to AM shortly for the 2.3 issue - SQLAlchemy aims to be 2.3 compatible, although I'm not sure it gets tested much. >If we being the 0.4 port of TG 1.0.x then we need to assess how much >time we need. So if you tell me you want to try this with me I propose >we setup irc "rendez-vous" for Wednesday --> Friday included and hack >like hell :) > > Sounds good, do you want to meet at 7pm GMT? Anyone else interested is welcome too. >Python 2.4 and python 2.5 pass all test _if_ nose 0.9.2 is used. Nose >0.9.3 or anything upper (0.10.xx) borks errors out in all directions. > This is tests relying on state falling through from previous tests. A proper fix would be a big job, but I've hacked the tests so now only 2 fail with nose 0.10. I'll take a look at 2.3 at some point. Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
