> There was some talk about ripping newforms out of Django and using > that, but I think we're pretty committed to ToscaWidgets.
Funny, because I was thinking about doing the exact opposite with DBSprockets. Django is on my proverbial chopping block. > We do need to add another couple core TW committers before I'll feel > really happy about the dependency. I'm personally a bit wary of > having TG2 dependencies with a truck number < 3 (The truck number is > the number of team-members that could be hit by a truck without the > whole thing falling apart irrevocably. (See > also:http://www.jaredrichardson.net/blog/2005/08/02/) Am I *not* a toscawidgets committer? I thought I was. If not, givey, givey. I already have one change to make TW Grok/Zope compatible. I agree, Alberto is busy. > > In the case of ToscaWidgets it looks like Alberto has everything in > his head, but I know a couple of people (florent, and chris) who seem > to be able to navigate their way around pretty well. I know both of > them are running other major projects (TG1 and DBSprockets), but I'm > at least not as worried as I was before. But I would like to see > another core developer on TW, and I'd like to see somebody step up and > work on TW docs. Alberto has divulged at least a few pieces of *magic* to me because I used similar design patterns in DBSprox. I can help explain how things work as much as possible, I just can't write docs for someone else's project and produce 4000+ lines of code in 2 months. I have someone helping me with the DBSprox dox, maybe I can get him to help with TW once he comes up to speed. > > Fundamentally, at this point I think my only reservation about TW has > to do with the Docs. If there were more docs, there would be more > users, if there were more users bugs and corner cases would be found > and eliminated, and TW would be in good shape. So, if you are > willing to work on docs, I think we should consider committing > ourselves 100% to TW ;) > > --Mark Ramm > I think TW will become a lot more attractive once people start using DBSprockets.Primitives more. There *will* be good documentation for that. I promise. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
