On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 18:45 -0500, Mark Ramm wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 11:58 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd like to propose that we declare the next stable TG2 release 2.0 > >> and that we work together to get a release candidate by the end of the > >> year. > > > > I assume this means rather than TG 1.9.7.beta3, we'll be seeing TG > > 2.0.0.beta1 next right? > > Seems about right, and that was the plan. > > Though I'm not opposed to keeping the numbering scheme we have now > until the stable release becomes 2.0.
I'm +1 on that. I think major release numbers create a lot of expectation in terms of polish and that it is a big marketing no-no to rush the major release numbers. my two cents Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
