On Saturday February 7, 2009 19:35:22 Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > today I began migrating our app to TG2b5. Works good so far, the biggest > issues were in the authentication-layer (unsurprisingly). > > However, I noticed an apparent bug in the current docs, where instead of > "allow_only" they speak of "_require" as the class-attribute that's > going to be checked for authentication.
Thanks, I just fixed that. > And I wonder if "allow_only" (as well as the old "require") isn't too > likely to collide for some people with potential controller-action-names? > > I'd personally think, something like "__require__" or "__allow_only__" > would be better, don't you think? That's what I suggested initially but some people disagreed (well, I proposed a single underscore). By the way, we're talking about authorization not authentication. Cheers. -- Gustavo Narea <http://gustavonarea.net/>. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
