>> And I wonder if "allow_only" (as well as the old "require") isn't too >> likely to collide for some people with potential controller-action-names? >> >> I'd personally think, something like "__require__" or "__allow_only__" >> would be better, don't you think? > > That's what I suggested initially but some people disagreed (well, I proposed > a single underscore).
You have a pointer to that discussion? And a single underscore might a bit not-special-enough I'd say. > > By the way, we're talking about authorization not authentication. Darn, I always confuses them. Diez --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
