On Saturday February 7, 2009 19:50:00 Diez B. Roggisch wrote: > > That's what I suggested initially but some people disagreed (well, I > > proposed a single underscore). > > You have a pointer to that discussion? And a single underscore might a > bit not-special-enough I'd say.
It was discussed on IRC and I can't remember when exactly, sorry. In this case, either one or two underscores would be fine by me. I thought and think that's better than "allow_only", but maybe it's a little late to change it. > > By the way, we're talking about authorization not authentication. > > Darn, I always confuses them. ;-) Cheers. -- Gustavo Narea <http://gustavonarea.net/>. Get rid of unethical constraints! Get freedomware: http://www.getgnulinux.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
