Excellent insight. Thank you. I don't know how I'm going to use it, not entirely, but I am going to use it. Now that you've pointed it out, I have a hard time not seeing the problems.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Alessandro Molina <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Michael Pedersen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Alessandro: Why do you say that the 2.1 pages are harder to read? I >> ask because I need someone else's point of view on this. >> > > I don't know if anyone else share this with me, but I my perception > has been that the 2.1 pages are less readable mainly due to the less > space given to the "real content" section. > > In 2.0 real content was 3-4 times as big as the sidebar, in 2.1 they > are nearly the same size. Having a small content section makes text > longer to scroll vertically which makes harder to read it and longer > to find the info you are looking for. > > Maybe also changing font size or background color of the sidebar might > help, when not paying attention I often found myself with my eyes on > the sidebar when I was instead trying to look info on the doc. My > brain seems to unconsciously mix sidebar and content in only one > column as they look similar. > > just my two cents :D > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears Trunk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. > > -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
