On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <c...@online.de> wrote: > Am 17.02.2011 17:50 schrieb Michael Pedersen: >> >> I'll get myself logged into it tonight and check it out. I'm not going >> to promise anything. I will say that it looks promising, though. Then >> again, github looks promising, too. Part of me wonders if we might not >> be better off with github vs SF, too. Some of what they offer looks >> amazing in comparison. > > Concerning flow.io please don't misundertand me, I don't propose it as an > alternative bug tracker, just as an additional tool for handling the high > level management tasks which are not directly related to the code and > relatively few compared to the number of trac tickets. > > And yes, github is not bad, but I think the bugtracker is also their weak > point. > > I'm currently busy but also want to evaluate the SF hosted trac option this > weekend, so please wait until I could have a look before making any drastic > moves. Also, maybe you can talk with the SF support team via IRC > (#sourceforge at freenode) regarding the forge tracker documentation. They > are usually very responsive and helpful. >
If you are interested in a "as a service project management tool" also take a look at http://www.assembla.com/ we used it for a few project and it is quite good. It is also free for opensource projects. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
