On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Concerning flow.io please don't misundertand me, I don't propose it as an > alternative bug tracker, just as an additional tool for handling the high > level management tasks which are not directly related to the code and > relatively few compared to the number of trac tickets. > I'm thinking that I can see how the two sides link together. I've sent the email asking how we can sign up for the free solution, and we'll see what happens from there. > And yes, github is not bad, but I think the bugtracker is also their weak > point. > Since I've not used their bug tracker, I can't argue for or against it at all. I'm glad someone else can fill me in before I go down a bad path, though. Thank you. > I'm currently busy but also want to evaluate the SF hosted trac option this > weekend, so please wait until I could have a look before making any drastic > moves. Also, maybe you can talk with the SF support team via IRC > (#sourceforge at freenode) regarding the forge tracker documentation. They > are usually very responsive and helpful. I'll hold off on doing anything with the tracker, or with getting a VPS, until you send word back. Since you seem to have that well under control, I'll leave it to you. Between now and then, I guess the next thing to do is for me to get to work on making 2.0.4 happen. I'll see how much I can get done for that tonight. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Alessandro Molina < [email protected]> wrote: > If hosting for TG web content is needed just let me know, my company > provides WSGI hosting service so I probably can easilly get hosting > for anything needed by TG for free. > I don't mind paying for the hosting. If we get large enough, though, having sponsors would be a good thing. That's a ways off, though. > It won't fail, but in my opinion is just more complicated to manage > than being able to push to both 2.2 and 2.1 branches and just tag both > the new 2.1.1 and 2.2 releases. Just my two cents, in the end I'm open > to working with any branching strategy. TG is a quite linear project. > I don't know. I'm going to continue to learn more about git before I make that "final" choice. Since 2.0.4 is on a branch that really doesn't have much of anything to do with 2.1 (well, history/commit wise, anyway), I'm going to keep it on its own branch, I think. Time to start getting patches/fixes in place, I think. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Alessandro Molina < [email protected]> wrote: > If you are interested in a "as a service project management tool" also > take a look at http://www.assembla.com/ we used it for a few project > and it is quite good. It is also free for opensource projects. > I took a look at them tonight. They seem like something I've been looking for for work. Not sure about their pricing, but I'm going to suggest it. However, I think that they might be too much for TG right now, especially with our trying to get migrated to SF (that is still the overall desired goal). I know that we don't have to use all of their features, but it definitely seems a shame not to. For us, I don't think they're a good fit. At least, not as good as flow.io. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Mark Ramm <[email protected]>wrote: > I'll talk to folks on this end and make sure we get the migration API > docs pushed out into a publicly accessible place. > Thanks Mark! I do appreciate it. We really do want to switch entirely to SF. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > @Michael: We should prolong the ultimatum for the SF tracker migration now > that we have some code and hopefully soon also docs for the tracker API. We > need some time to experiment with this. > Agreed. I'm thinking that we'll hold off on a finalized choice until I can get the work completed for 2.0.4. At that point, we have to do something. Now, to find out how much work that actually *is*... -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
