Also currently travis.ci doesn't provide support for bitbucket, and travis was one of the reasons for moving to GitHub.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 10.09.2012 17:11, schrieb Christophe de Vienne: > >> Have you considered bitbucket too ? IIRC the tg repositories were once >> hosted there, and it has the same avantages over SF (the ones you >> mention at least). > > > That would mean switching from git back to hg again. Much easier to stay > with git. It's bad enough that we have to change our project platform again, > but at least please let's not change the VCS type and convert the repository > again! Also, I remember there was a long discussion where some developers > had issues with both bitbucket and hg, and wanted to use git instead. Not > sure if these were real issues, or if they are solved now, but that's > actually why we moved away from bitbucket. If we move, we should at least > not move in circles. > > -- Christoph > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TurboGears Trunk" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
