On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Christoph Zwerschke <c...@online.de>wrote:
> Am 10.09.2012 17:11, schrieb Christophe de Vienne: > > Have you considered bitbucket too ? IIRC the tg repositories were once >> hosted there, and it has the same avantages over SF (the ones you >> mention at least). >> > > That would mean switching from git back to hg again. Much easier to stay > with git. It's bad enough that we have to change our project platform > again, but at least please let's not change the VCS type and convert the > repository again! Also, I remember there was a long discussion where some > developers had issues with both bitbucket and hg, and wanted to use git > instead. Not sure if these were real issues, or if they are solved now, but > that's actually why we moved away from bitbucket. If we move, we should at > least not move in circles. > > -- Christoph > > > FYI, bitbucket supports git repos now, as well as hg ones. Kevin Horn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
