Ilias Lazaridis wrote: ... [In reply to the messages above, which contain typical justifications]
> projects should really look a little at other implementations: > > http://db.apache.org/ojb/ > > Providing a _standard_ OO interface is the most important need for the > whol python domain. the OMG standard is not specific to java. > The turbogears project would benefit from a possible upgrade path to > large-scale commercial ODBMS. > > http://odbms.org/ A subset of a standard can be implemented, this _still_ gives a migration path to other ODBMS systems. - I am basicly close before to drop python again (after selecting it in preference to JAVA), mainly due to the missing persistency system and _especially_ due to the inability of the community to bundle and channelize efforts. Please realize: Not _one_ persistency system can fulfill thos _very_ _basic_ requirements: http://case.lazaridis.com/wiki/Persist#Requirements . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
