On 7/2/07, blackthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, yes... This can be seen as an extension to toolbox. > But i really sugest you to take a look to the link i presented where i > gather a diagram with detail on the features that make part of this > idea because i can't find most of them on Toolbox or fully integrated > with it. > actually I did, if you notice my comment said "what the toolbox wants to be" not what the toolbox is :)
> For instance, one of the things that this extra "layer" would allow is > to no longer require the developer to type commands for each task he > wants to perform. That could be entirely done threw a nice web > interface. > yea I'll have to disagree on that, developers should use their shell :) > Thanks for your reply > In general I think it's a nice idea I just think you should think of a way of integrating it into the current toolbox (even replace some of it's components) so instead of making it "another layer" it will be "the layer" or a layer's extension :) > On Jul 2, 10:42 pm, "Jorge Vargas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/2/07, blackthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > hi > > > > > My name is Francisco Gama and i'm here to propose a project. Since i > > > choose TurboGears as platform to build it i created a full description > > > of the project which i'm only sharing (for now) to TG community > > > (http://blackthorne.planetaclix.pt). > > > > that sounds like what the toolbox wants to be. > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
