Em Sunday 06 January 2008 10:45:52 Christoph Zwerschke escreveu: > Jorge Godoy wrote: > > Are we talking about "endorsing" a library? I thought the idea was not > > shipping any. > > Good point. I think it's about which library should be preferred to > built the more advanced widgets with, like AjaxGrid or AutoCompleteField.
But won't these be available through TW only? I thought we were moving widgets code out of TG2 and into TW. > It is desirable that all widgets and widget libraries use the same > library (or maybe a set of 2 or 3 compatible libraries), so that they > can be mixed without getting into library conflicts and clients do not > need to load and run so much different stuff. If those are available through TW, then it doesn't matter to TG. What is desirable, in fact, is cacheing and making the load of such JS libs as fast as possible (probably using some minimization and compression...). > In case of need, you can still create your own widgets using a different > library, but there should be a recommended choice. I think TG is all > about making good choices for the developers that they are allowed to > break if they know what they're doing. I'd still recommend MK because of its pythonic "interface" and the concern that Bob has with unit tests and having things done the right way. It doesn't bother me that much that there was no 1.4 release yet... -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
