Read the following thread and may be you'll get your answer. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/turbogears-trunk/PRiV1D7j7UU
On Monday, 17 September 2012 01:48:54 UTC+5:30, Roberto Guerra wrote: > > > Honest question from a newbie: why github over bitbucket? > > > On Monday, September 10, 2012 7:56:24 AM UTC-6, Michael Pedersen wrote: >> >> Okay, a couple weeks back, right after we released TG 2.2.0, we >> discovered a few things about the sourceforge system that makes it no >> longer desirable for using as our tracker. We had been thinking of >> using Github back when we switched last year, but (at the time) we >> chose SF. >> >> Now, we're going to make the switch to Github. I'm in the process of >> writing a migration tool that will copy all the pieces over for us. >> One question, though, has arisen, and this change is both significant >> and inconsequential. All of our previous systems have used one issue >> tracker for the entire project. Github uses one tracker per >> repository, and we have three repositories (core, docs, and >> tutorials). This means that I have to do something different for >> copying ticket information, and I want to ask for feedback before I do >> it. Here's the options: >> >> 1. Copy every ticket into every repository's issue tracker. Good: >> Ticket numbers are preserved. Bad: Tickets are fully duplicated, which >> could make it difficult for people to track the tickets they genuinely >> care about. Also means we have to close a bunch of them >> inappropriately (a ticket applies only to docs, so it has be closed on >> core and on tutorials). >> >> 2. Copy only relevant tickets, but use placeholders for non-relevant >> tickets. Good: Ticket numbers are preserved. Bad: Lots of tickets in >> each repository that will read "Placeholder. Please ignore." >> >> 3. Copy only relevant tickets. Good: Each repository's issues are kept >> to being just the relevant items. Bad: Ticket numbers are not >> preserved. >> >> I'm leaning towards number three, personally. However, I know that >> there are some people who will prefer (or even demand) one of the >> others, so as to preserve ticket numbering. >> >> What do you think? Which one would you prefer? >> >> -- >> Michael J. Pedersen >> My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/ -- Google+ >> http://plus.ly/pedersen >> Google Talk: [email protected] -- Twitter: pedersentg >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/turbogears/-/elBFovtIsewJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
