On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Roberto Guerra <[email protected]> wrote: > Honest question from a newbie: why github over bitbucket?
The answers for this are not actually deep. I did answer this question above, but here's the answer again (copy pasted from above): Github, for better or worse, has more developer activity (or, at least, the perception of it). This makes Github more desirable over Bitbucket. The second reason is because we did use Bitbucket in the past. I'm worried that using it again would increase confusion with links to no longer valid repository URLs (in part because we very much modified the repository structure when we migrated from Bitbucket). While we don't deliberately leave the old URLs around, they are in mailing list archives and the like. That source of confusion should be avoided if possible. So, even though Bitbucket is nice, the balance of factors leans towards Github. -- Michael J. Pedersen My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/ -- Google+ http://plus.ly/pedersen Google Talk: [email protected] -- Twitter: pedersentg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en.
