On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/10/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How about making a tuscany-scdl4j jar for this? Something like the
> > tuscany-sca-all jar but only containing the modules and classes
> necessary
> > for processing the scdl and creating model objects? We did talk about
> > having
> > something like this at one point, is it worth revisiting?
> >
> >    ...ant
> >
> > On 10/9/07, Sean Zhou (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Bootstrapping a subset of Tuscany runtime to support object modeling
> in
> > > tools
> > >
> > >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >                  Key: TUSCANY-1840
> > >                  URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840
> > >              Project: Tuscany
> > >           Issue Type: New Feature
> > >           Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> > >     Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0.1
> > >          Environment: Windows or Linux
> > >             Reporter: Sean Zhou
> > >             Priority: Critical
> > >              Fix For: Java-SCA-1.0.1
> > >
> > >
> > > When adopting Tuscany object models in a tooling environment, a subset
> > of
> > > Tuscany runtime requires bootstrap such as creating extension points
> and
> > > factories. Currently there are no standard API methods or classes for
> > > Tuscany bootstrapping for modeling.
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > -
> > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> I think it would. Also it would be useful to take a look at what the
> minimum
> set of steps (from the ReallySmallRuntime) are required to get a
> contribution loaded into the assembly model. Currently we all use
> ReallySmallRuntime but it's doing a number of things that are not required
> to get just the assembly model up.
>
> Simon
>

Right i agree, and I guess initially the scdl4j jar could include copies of
whatever code from ReallySmallRuntime is necessary to load a contribution
and then later on maybe simplify all the runtime code so it just depends on
the scdl4j code.

   ...ant

Reply via email to