On 10/10/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How are we going to handle the Tuscany extensions ? Are we going to > include all the implementation.xxx and binding.xxx from Tuscany or > only the minimum required to support the SCA spec 1.0 SCDL elements ?
If there does end up being something like all the relevant modules and classes munged together into an scdl4j jar then there isn't any reason not to included any of the Tuscany extensions as long as they don't bring in any additional dependencies. So you just need scdl4j and stax and you can process any of our composites. Still makes sense to support the same meta-inf/services extension mechanism to you can add additional scdl extensions that aren't included in the scdl4j jar. ..ant
