The guy who raised TUSCANY-1840, Synapse, the Eclipse SOA tools project? It could be one of those "if we make it they will use it" type of things. Can you imagine what it would be like using wsdl without wsdl4j?
...ant On 10/10/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Folks, > > Do we have any potential consumers for this capability? > > If so, what are their requirements.... > > > Yours, Mike. > > ant elder wrote: > > On 10/10/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 10/10/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> How about making a tuscany-scdl4j jar for this? Something like the > >>> tuscany-sca-all jar but only containing the modules and classes > >> necessary > >>> for processing the scdl and creating model objects? We did talk about > >>> having > >>> something like this at one point, is it worth revisiting? > >>> > >>> ...ant > >>> > >>> On 10/9/07, Sean Zhou (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Bootstrapping a subset of Tuscany runtime to support object modeling > >> in > >>>> tools > >>>> > >>>> > >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> Key: TUSCANY-1840 > >>>> URL: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1840 > >>>> Project: Tuscany > >>>> Issue Type: New Feature > >>>> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime > >>>> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0.1 > >>>> Environment: Windows or Linux > >>>> Reporter: Sean Zhou > >>>> Priority: Critical > >>>> Fix For: Java-SCA-1.0.1 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> When adopting Tuscany object models in a tooling environment, a > subset > >>> of > >>>> Tuscany runtime requires bootstrap such as creating extension points > >> and > >>>> factories. Currently there are no standard API methods or classes for > >>>> Tuscany bootstrapping for modeling. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > >>>> - > >>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >> I think it would. Also it would be useful to take a look at what the > >> minimum > >> set of steps (from the ReallySmallRuntime) are required to get a > >> contribution loaded into the assembly model. Currently we all use > >> ReallySmallRuntime but it's doing a number of things that are not > required > >> to get just the assembly model up. > >> > >> Simon > >> > > > > Right i agree, and I guess initially the scdl4j jar could include copies > of > > whatever code from ReallySmallRuntime is necessary to load a > contribution > > and then later on maybe simplify all the runtime code so it just depends > on > > the scdl4j code. > > > > ...ant > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
