Are you saying you'd prefer not to participate, or do you want us all to
stop having the weekly chat?

  ...ant

On 7/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a thread going on over on incubator-general about the use of
IRC:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115111286000001&r=1&w=2
>
> Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat? I
find
> the chat a useful way to find whats going on and gauge peoples opinions.
A 1
> hour chat isn't so long that its hard to read the chat log, we could
> probably do better at providing a summary of what was said, and maybe
post
> the log and summary on the wiki so its easier to find. So I think the
> current chat is useful and works ok but we can change this if others
don't
> like it.
>
> Currently the chat focus has been primarily Java SCA, should we try and
> include C++ or SDO or DAS more? Or have separate extra chats for those?
> Often the chat is one long rambling conversation, should we try to be
more
> structured and have a set 10 minutes for this, 10 minutes for that type
of
> thing to just get a regular status and have any followup discussion on
the
> mailing list?
>
> Is the 15:30GMT on Monday time slot ok?
>
> What do you think?
>

I'm not very comfortable with using IRC for these kind of weekly
meetings - it seems too much like a "status meeting" to me. IMO if
someone needs to be on IRC to see what is going on or what people's
opinions are then we are not doing a good enough job of communicating
on the mailing list.

To me the main benefit from IRC is its immediacy. It provides a faster
form of communication than email and that can be used to bring closure
to issues that are dragging along on the list. In that mode, IRC
discussions tend to more impromptu, more focused, and simpler to
summarize as the subject is already well known.

--
Jeremy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to