AFAICT no one has suggested a ban on IRC, what I'm trying to find out is if we should be continuing with the regularly scheduled weekly chat. If enough people don't think we should be having it then we should stop. Thats a perfectly fine thing to happen if thats what the community want, but its not going to get stopped unless those who don't think we should be having it speak up clearly. That's what this thread is about - " Are people happy with having our current weekly hour long IRC chat?"
...ant On 7/5/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ant was just trying to be helpful by gauging what people would like to use IRC for, although I also have to say I didn't interpret Jeremy's previous mail to be advocating a ban on IRC. I think there has been a lot of heated discussion on the list lately, and it would probably be good for us all to "chill out" a bit and not take things to extremes... That said, I find IRC chats useful as long as substantive discussions and all decisions of import take place on the list. I like how the chats provide an unstructured forum to ask quick questions and communicate. I don't think we need the overhead of having an agenda,"deciding" what gets discussed, or time boxing topics (as long as people have an equal opportunity to talk). I also don't see a problem if someone wants to send a note to the list saying they would like to discuss a particular topic so people can prepare ahead of time. Jim On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On 7/5/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are you saying you'd prefer not to participate, or do you want us >> all to >> stop having the weekly chat? >> > > Ant, please, that's not what I said at all. > > I said that, IMO (for what that's worth), I see the main benefit of > IRC is its use as tool to help reach consensus when discussions on the > mailing list bog down. Using IRC in that manner does not require a > scheduled meeting. > > As pointed out on the incubator thread, having a scheduled meeting can > act as a deterrant to participation. For example, one reason that I am > reluctant to join in some other IRC meetings is that they occur at > 5:30AM my time and my desire to participate does not exceed my desire > for sleep. > > As Jim pointed out here, people often have other commitments that may > impact their ability to participate - IIRC he cited travel issues. > Being async, email does not have those problems which is why it is the > preferred form of communication at the ASF. > > -- > Jeremy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
