On 10/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think organizing the samples like this is a good idea. I'd suggest going one step further and place each sample with the implementation of the service that it is illustrating. That way it becomes much easier to tag/release each module on its own.
I'm not sure I follow "place each sample with the implementation of the service that it is illustrating" , do you mean something like: samples/helloworld/java samples/helloworld/javascript samples/calculator/java samples/calculator/javascript Or do you mean include them with the extension so the JavaScript folder would include samples/helloworld and samples/calculator? I didn't think Jim liked this way, from the previous thread - "In other words, each sample project should not be a sibling to the project containing extension code but should go under a samples folder in separate projects". ...ant
