Previously we had discussed having a "sampleapps" directory to distinguish "business samples" from technology samples.[1] Do we want to continue this distinction?
Brent [1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01812.html On 10/6/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok I think we're getting some agreement but I'd like to be clear everyone agrees and is happy before I make any changes. Sounds like for things like the Groovy/JavaScript/etc helloworld and calculator type samples they would go with the extension, I'm guessing samples that use just sca and java would go in an sca/samples directory. Samples that use multiple extensions but still just SCA would also go in the sca/samples directory, and there'd be a top level samples directory for things like bigbank that use sca/sdo/das. So: samples/bingbank das/samples/companyweb sca/samples/calculator sca/services/containers/container.javascript/src/samples/calculator Comments? ...ant On 10/5/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:14 AM, ant elder wrote: > > > On 10/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I think organizing the samples like this is a good idea. I'd suggest > >> going one step further and place each sample with the implementation > >> of the service that it is illustrating. That way it becomes much > >> easier to tag/release each module on its own. > > > > > > I'm not sure I follow "place each sample with the implementation of > > the > > service that it is illustrating" , do you mean something like: > > > > samples/helloworld/java > > samples/helloworld/javascript > > samples/calculator/java > > samples/calculator/javascript > > > > Or do you mean include them with the extension so the JavaScript > > folder > > would include samples/helloworld and samples/calculator? I didn't > > think Jim > > liked this way, from the previous thread - "In other words, each > > sample > > project should not be a sibling to the project containing extension > > code but > > should go under a samples folder in separate projects". > I was thinking samples for particular extensions would go under the > particular extension's directory. For samples that used multiple > extensions, they would go under the master samples folder. I liked > what was done with the calculator where stuff is shared between > projects (component reuse) so if that structuring won't work for re- > use I would be fine with what Ant just outlined. My preference, > though, would be to group samples with individual extensions. > > Jim > > > > > ...ant > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
