Hi SCA/OSGi-ers, Just bringing this up again to see if there is any interesting in moving this along still. We've been talking about having a Tuscany 1.0 release in a couple of months, be great if we could have a good OSGi story for that. Also the Apache Felix 1.0 release is out now and the existing implemention.osgicode has been moved off SNAPSHOTs to use Felix 1.0 so we can now include that in releases (though i think one of the itests still has an intermittent failure so would be good to fix that as well).
...ant On 6/29/07, Hawkins, Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi SCA/OSGi-ers. > > I did some initial work back during the M2 days (working with Nicole) to > host Tuscany in an Equinox runtime. It looks like I may have some time > to re-engage during the next few months, so is there anything in > particular that I could be looking at to help move the OSGi efforts > ahead? Like Bill and Raymond below, my primary interest is in seeing > OSGi used as a container for hosting SCA. > > Cheers, > Joel > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rajini Sivaram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 4:20 AM > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: Contribute to SCA-OSGi integration > > Sebastien, > > Graham and I will be looking at the support for packaging of SCA > contributions as OSGi bundles, once the work on implementation.osgi is > complete. > > > Thank you... > > Regards, > > Rajini > > On 6/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Bill Barnhill wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As I may have mentioned earlier I also have been working on the > SCA-OSGi > > > integration, but from the third aspect that Raymond mentions, using > > > OSGi as > > > an underlying technology for an SCA container providing an extension > > > mechanism, dependency resolution and service registry capabilities. > > > > > > I think my work would dovetail nicely with the work Rajini and > Graham > > > have > > > been doing. Would it be possible to create an osgi directory under > > > contrib > > > with a subdir under that for each of our efforts (host, binding, > > > implementation) > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > That sounds like a good idea. Tuscany modules are not that different > > from OSGI bundles, I think it wouldn't be too difficult to package > them > > as actual bundles, and come up with a variation of host-embedded that > > will load them as such, allowing for some isolation and better > > jar/bundle dependency management. > > > > Do you have the structure you need with sca/modules/host-osgi? Do you > > have code that we can look at? > > > > Any questions or issues that we can help with? > > > > On a different, but related subject, has anybody started on supporting > > the package of (application) SCA contributions (as defined by the SCA > > assembly spec) as OSGI bundles? > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It > contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately > and then destroy it. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
